Key takeaways
- Structured payment references are the foundation of fast, accurate reconciliation.
- PayTo payments settle in near real time, changing how finance teams match and close transactions.
- Exception handling for paused agreements, failed attempts and partial payments requires clear workflows.
- Daily exports combined with webhook events give the best reporting coverage.
- Finance and engineering should collaborate on reference design and export formats from day one.
Why reconciliation is different with PayTo
Traditional payment methods settle in batches, often over multiple business days. PayTo changes this by enabling near real time settlement with structured data attached to each payment. This means finance teams can match payments to invoices faster and with greater accuracy. It also means that reconciliation workflows need to be designed for speed rather than batch processing. Teams that have already improved cash flow with real time payment solutions will find PayTo reconciliation a natural next step.
Designing payment references
Every PayTo payment should carry a stable, unique reference that maps directly to an invoice, order or customer record. Common approaches include combining an invoice identifier with a customer identifier and an optional checksum. References should be short enough to fit within system limits but descriptive enough for automated matching. Consistency matters more than complexity. A simple, predictable reference structure will save hours of manual reconciliation over time.
Reporting and exports
Most teams benefit from a combination of daily exports and real time webhook events. Daily exports provide a complete snapshot for end of day reconciliation and accounting close. Webhooks deliver immediate notification of payment events, making it possible to flag exceptions as they happen. Finance dashboards should surface outstanding items, failed payments and agreement status changes. Understanding the business impact of real time payments helps teams prioritise which reports to build first.
Exception handling
Not every payment will succeed on the first attempt. Paused agreements, insufficient funds and customer disputes all create exceptions that need to be handled gracefully. For paused agreements, the system should stop attempting collection and notify the customer. Failed payments should trigger a retry workflow with configurable rules. Disputes require a clear evidence trail linking the payment to the original PayTo agreement and consent record.
Implementation checklist
- Define a payment reference format and document it for all teams.
- Configure daily export jobs and webhook listeners for payment events.
- Build exception handling workflows for failed, paused and disputed payments.
- Test reconciliation with realistic data volumes before launch.
- Align finance and engineering on reporting requirements and export formats.
- Review the PayTo API for platforms guide for technical integration details.
.svg)
